OpenAI Decisions API Hits Public Beta With 10x Faster Typed Answers
Oct 9, 2026, 1:05 PM · MarkTechPost
OpenAI is admitting what developers already knew: a lot of AI work is just a label. Its new Decisions API returns the answer, not the essay.
Why it matters
OpenAI has put its Decisions API into public beta, MarkTechPost reports. It takes text, images or both and returns typed answers code can act on: a probability for a yes-or-no check, a pick from a list, or a score on an ordered scale. OpenAI says it runs about 10x faster than its Responses API. The only supported model today is gpt-6-luna.
Pricing is simple. Input costs $0.10 per 1M tokens, with no charge for output or caching, though regional premiums and long-context multipliers still apply. It supports Zero Data Retention and HIPAA for eligible customers, with US and European data residency.
This targets one of the most common patterns in AI apps: ask a model a question, then scrape a label out of its reply. Making that a first-class product is a meaningful shift.
From the desk
We think this is a sensible, overdue product. Plenty of real AI work is classification: is this photo damaged, which queue does this ticket go to, how severe is this outage. Asking a chat model to write prose and then parsing it is wasteful and fragile. Returning a probability directly is cheaper, faster and easier to audit.
The probability part is the bit we like most. A score with a number attached forces teams to decide what threshold triggers an action. That is healthier than a confident sentence nobody questions. OpenAI's docs even advise setting thresholds with labeled examples from your own application, which is the right instinct.
But here is the gap. OpenAI has not published accuracy or calibration data for the endpoint. A probability is only useful if 70 percent really means right about 70 percent of the time. Until independent tests show that, the numbers are a promise, not a guarantee. The speed figure is also OpenAI's own claim, and coverage put a decision near 150 milliseconds against about 1.6 seconds for regular Luna calls.
The competitive angle is hard to miss. TypeSafe's Jev, launched in September, does the same kind of thing and is cheaper on input at $0.042 per 1M tokens. OpenAI's edge is image input, compliance options and an open beta anyone can try. This looks like a platform responding fast to a startup that found a real gap.
The downside if this scales is the familiar one. Cheap, instant decisions make it easy to automate judgments that used to get a human glance, in moderation, claims and screening. We would like to see OpenAI ship calibration data and guidance on human review before general availability.
Context
OpenAI positions Decisions for probabilities, choices and scores, Structured Outputs for filling a JSON schema or writing explanations, and function calling for tool requests. It says general availability is expected in the coming weeks.
Who feels it
- Developers
- Classification and routing calls can move to a dedicated endpoint with free output tokens, but teams should test calibration on their own labeled data.
- Enterprises
- HIPAA eligibility, Zero Data Retention and US and EU residency make it easier to use in regulated workflows.
- TypeSafe and other startups
- OpenAI is now competing directly in typed decisions, putting pressure on price and differentiation.
What to watch
- Whether OpenAI publishes accuracy and calibration data before general availability
- Support for models beyond gpt-6-luna
- Independent latency and cost comparisons with TypeSafe Jev
- How developers set thresholds and human-review rules in production
Companies: OpenAI