The US let Nvidia sell chips to an empty office in China
Nov 7, 2026, 7:43 AM · The Verge

An approved H200 buyer whose China office is an empty shell with dangling wires is not a paperwork glitch — it is the export regime telling on itself.
Why it matters
The New York Times reporting, as carried by The Verge, says New Matrix sits on the approved list for Nvidia H200 AI chips even though its listed address is a hollow gray shell, the building directory does not name the firm, and local property managers say they have no record of it. The company was created about 17 months ago; what little ownership trail exists points toward a Chinese private equity firm blacklisted by the U.S. since 2024.
This is not framed as one odd shell company. The Times pattern is that firms linked to entities already under national-security trade restrictions keep clearing the gate to buy Nvidia chips. After Biden-era limits, the Trump administration relaxed China sales once Nvidia agreed to hand the government a 15-percent cut of those sales — and Jensen Huang’s lobbying sat next to a reported Chinese intelligence interest in him.
Export controls only work if the buyer is real. An empty office on the approved list is how restricted silicon walks into the wrong hands while everyone still claims a process.
From the desk
We’re not anti-chip. Nvidia’s gear powers useful AI — hospitals, labs, factories, tools people actually ship. What we are against is pretending a revenue share plus a paperwork list equals diligence.
Here’s the read: when the state takes a cut of China sales and the buyer’s office has wires hanging where lights should be, the control story and the commercial story have merged. The 15-percent deal reframed restricted chips as a taxable export product. New Matrix is the stress test of whether anyone still checks who is standing at the receiving end.
I’m watching the incentives, not the slogans. Nvidia wants volume. Washington wants a political win and a cut. Beijing wants advanced silicon. Shell intermediaries thrive in that triangle. The Times allegation that this is a pattern — not a one-off — is the part that should keep auditors awake.
Useful AI does not need hollow counterparties. If H200-class hardware is moving through firms that barely exist on paper, the downside is not a bad quarter for Nvidia. It is dual-use compute landing where the blacklist was supposed to stop it, while the public is told the list is working.
Name the harm plainly: weak end-user checks turn export policy into theater. Fix the vetting, or stop claiming the gate holds.
Context
Nvidia faced China chip restrictions under Biden. The Trump administration eased those limits after Nvidia agreed to give the government 15 percent of China sales revenue. Jensen Huang lobbied hard for access; separate reporting says China’s Ministry of State Security targeted him in a spying plot involving a Megaspeed executive.
The Verge piece sits on top of the Times investigation into approved Chinese buyers and the emptiness of New Matrix’s footprint.
Who feels it
- Policymakers and Commerce
- An empty approved buyer is an audit failure. End-user verification has to be physical and financial, not just a form that clears.
- Nvidia and chip vendors
- Revenue-share politics will not shield the company if blacklisted-linked shells keep clearing. Treat buyer diligence as a national-security product requirement.
- Enterprises and cloud buyers
- Supply-chain and sanctions risk now includes whether counterparties in restricted markets are real operating firms — not letterhead.
What to watch
- Whether Commerce removes or re-vets New Matrix and similar approved buyers after the Times reporting.
- Whether Congress or inspectors general open a formal review of H200 end-user checks tied to the 15-percent China-sales deal.
- Whether Nvidia discloses tighter KYC or on-site verification steps for China-bound AI chips.
Companies: NVIDIA