SDSignal Desk

Muse Creates Detailed Profiles of All Your Friends and Family

Oct 3, 2026, 5:00 AM · WIRED

Image: WIRED

Researchers pulled Muse’s own instructions: an hourly page for every person in your life — Facts, History, Open threads, Strengthening — built from whatever you plug in.

Why it matters

WIRED’s Lily Hay Newman and Matt Burgess report that independent researcher Karan Joshi extracted Muse system prompts and skill files through the normal chat interface. Among them: instructions to maintain “a page for every person in the user’s life,” refreshed hourly, covering family, partners, friends, colleagues, collaborators, and people you follow.

Those pages can grow sections like Facts, History, The relationship, In common, Open threads, and Strengthening — birthdays, arguments resolved, shared savings goals, “a reason to call.” Meta says the files were meant to be accessible for transparency, and that Muse only uses evidence the user has shared or public information. Millions have already downloaded the agent and connected banks, messages, or health data.

From the desk

We’re not shocked that a useful agent needs context about the people around you. We’re watching how Meta is productizing that context into a social graph the user never explicitly drew.

Joshi’s read lands: they want to know you like a friend. Meta spokesperson Daniel Roberts frames it as remembering the plumber who sent an invoice or which flowers a spouse liked. Fair as a demo. Creepy as a standing hourly dossier on everyone in your orbit — especially from a company whose core business is relationship inference at scale.

Oxford’s Carissa Véliz puts the asymmetry cleanly: we hand these systems far more than they hand back, and they infer the rest, correctly or not. CDT’s Miranda Bogen notes Muse leans harder into relationships than rival assistants, and that these tools solicit whole-life connectors — email, calendar, finance — rather than teaching people to cull data.

Useful personal AI is real. Remembering a birthday so you don’t forget is a feature. Compiling “Strengthening” suggestions for every colleague and collaborator from bank and message access is a different product: ambient intimacy as infrastructure. Meta’s per-user VM, wipeable memory, confirmation before purchases, and audit logs are the right shape of controls. They don’t fix the incentive to keep asking for more surface area.

I’m watching whether users can see and edit those person-pages as first-class objects — not buried memory — and whether regulators treat relationship dossiers as sensitive personal data even when the “evidence” came from the user’s inbox.

Context

Muse’s architecture gives each user a dedicated virtual machine; Meta says data isn’t shared across agents and users can disconnect services. The dump arrives amid a wider Muse privacy fight over Messages access and full-disk permissions on Mac.

Who feels it

Muse users
Assume every connected account can feed relationship pages. Audit connectors, wipe memory you don’t want structured, and treat “helpful suggestions about people” as a dossier feature.
Privacy advocates and regulators
Person-page instructions are a concrete artifact for consent and data-minimization debates — especially third-party privacy of contacts who never agreed to Muse.
Rival agent builders
Memory about people is becoming table stakes; transparency of what’s stored, and easy deletion, will separate trust-building products from creepy ones.

What to watch

  1. Whether Meta surfaces editable person-pages in the consumer UI
  2. Regulatory interest in contact dossiers built from user-granted connectors
  3. How Muse’s relationship memory behaves when users revoke Messages, mail, or calendar access

Read the original

Continue at the source.

WIRED

Companies: Meta

Also covering this